“whatever choice [of education style] we make, we have to make it based on some understanding of what it is we want students to accomplish, and what it is we as educators need to do to get them there.”

So even if young people don’t plan on majoring only in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics, it’s beneficial for them to have some understanding of the STEM world and ways of thinking. Students can complete a double major in STEM and another field, participate in STEM extra-curricular activities and competitions, or play epistemic games like Nephrotex and Land Science that simulate professional workplaces.

Rich sums it up best, “physics and poetry, anyone?”

The 2011 Frontiers of Engineering Education symposium is sponsored by the O’Donnell Foundation.

We continue to stress that expecting students to simply memorize and recite formulas and concepts is poor teaching. Students need to be taught the ways in which professionals in STEM fields use those formulas and concepts as problem solving tools. Students who play epistemic games are better prepared for the work that lies ahead. In epistemic games such as Nephrotex and Land Science, mentors who play the role of professionals encourage students to reflect on their actions in the game and make connections between values, skills, and knowledge in their STEM domain.

http://epistemicgames.org/eg/wp-content/uploads/hatfield_dissertation_print_final.pdf

This study examines a 21st century theory of learning and cognition, Epistemic Frame Theory, which argues that expertise, such as the kind involved in complex thinking and problem solving, fundamentally involves diverse and dynamic connections between different forms of knowing and acting, guided by the norms and principles of a particular community.

In this dissertation, I consider the challenge of measuring and assessing epistemic frames using a new measurement tool, epistemic network analysis (ENA), which focuses on the patterns of relations between knowledge and other aspects of expertise as they are mobilized together in the discourse of complex practice.
The context for this investigation is science.net, a computer-supported role playing game in which young people take up the role of reporters-in-training and educational researchers take up the role of mentor editors in a simulation of a professional journalism practicum designed to help players begin to think like professional journalists.

Through epistemic network analyses of mentor and player discourse this experiment suggests the connections between the particular ways of knowing, doing, being, caring, and justifying that constitute an epistemic frame can be quantified and measured. In turn, this means epistemic frame theory can be tested, providing a more rigorous basis for the design of learning environments to better prepare young people for the complex demands of the future.

http://epistemicgames.org/eg/wp-content/uploads/Bagley-Dissertation-FINAL.pdf

This dissertation examines how one approach to environmental education, the epistemic game Urban Science, extends an environmental education framework into a virtual environment that creates opportunities for young people to develop a combination of the skills, knowledge, values, identity, and epistemology needed to be environmentally literate. The aim of this study is to determine whether having mentors communicate with players through a virtual chat program rather than face-to-face changes anything about the players’ experience. Specifically, this study examines virtual chat versus face-to-face conditions during Urban Science and asks:

1. Was the mentors’ discourse during the reflection meetings different between the two conditions?
2. Was the players’ discourse during the reflection meetings different between the two conditions?
3. Were the players’ outcomes different between the two conditions?
4. Was the players’ level of engagement different between the two conditions?

Overall, these results suggest that since using more words did not impact the quality of the players’ professional discourse during the reflection meetings, the exit interviews outcomes, the quality of their final proposals, or their level of engagement, mentoring via chat is a viable method for mentoring in the context of epistemic games. A bolder interpretation of the results suggests that since mentoring in virtual and face-to-face conditions produced similar effects on players, epistemic mentoring could be automated and still retain the quality of interactions and players’ level of engagement. If the epistemic mentoring is automated, epistemic games like Urban Science could become more widely available to young people giving them the opportunity to help the world “move beyond what we already know in order to break beyond the boundaries of now to a more beautiful fabric of the future.”

A copy of his slide presentation can be found on slideshare, and a video of the entire seminar is made available by Think Digital (David’s presentation can be found about 55 minutes in).

In addition to being a featured speaker, David was interviewed by Julien Llanas of Académie de Créteil.

CCLI PI Conference Poster

http://epistemicgames.org/eg/wp-content/uploads/Chesler_ASEE_2011.pdf

The design of first-year engineering courses represents a classic engineering design problem there are multiple stakeholders with different criteria and constraints and, as a result, there is no single, optimal solution. Our goal was to develop a first-year engineering design course that meets the criteria and constraints of several traditional stakeholders and also provides a platform for studying the ways in which a first year engineering student progresses from thinking like a novice to thinking like a professional engineer. To do so, we developed a computer-based professional practice simulator that can be incorporated into pre-existing first-year Introduction to Engineering courses with minimal resources by course directors with no expertise in an engineering discipline. The simulation provides an introduction to professional communication styles, the engineering design process, library skills and citation requirements, and the engineering disciplines. Importantly, engineering knowledge and skills are not required to complete the two design-build-test cycles in the simulation; instead the emphasis is on managing conflicting client requirements, making trade-offs in selecting a final design and justifying design choices. This paper describes the design of the simulation and preliminary results from its inclusion in a first-year Introduction to Engineering course at our institution.

http://epistemicgames.org/eg/wp-content/uploads/DAngelo_CSCL2011.pdf

Teamwork and collaboration are vital 21st century skills that students need to master. Specially designed epistemic games modeled after professional practica can help students build and practice these skills. This paper presents preliminary results from a virtual engineering internship, an epistemic game for introductory engineering undergraduates. The game was designed to help build students’ skills in teamwork and collaboration while providing experiences relevant to engineering and design. After the internship students reported a better understanding of what engineers do and about the practice of engineering. Students also made content learning gains. Students overwhelmingly enjoyed the experience and felt encouraged to stay on an engineering career path.