<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The lessons of a PIM fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://epistemicgames.org/eg/the-lessons-of-a-pim-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://epistemicgames.org/eg/the-lessons-of-a-pim-fail/</link>
	<description>building the future of education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Williamson Shaffer</title>
		<link>http://epistemicgames.org/eg/the-lessons-of-a-pim-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-4923</link>
		<dc:creator>David Williamson Shaffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://epistemicgames.org/eg/the-lessons-of-a-pim-fail/#comment-4923</guid>
		<description>Hi, Rick and Alan! Nice to hear from both of you!

@Rick, I like your formulation (an ounce of cure...). Pithy as always.

@Alan, I agree that the formulation in the pdf you link to is really interesting. Thanks for posting it. We&#039;ll never know precisely what was said at that particular meeting, of course--now more than a decade ago. But I think it was part of a discussion that was making a slightly different point than your PDF. Regardless, if I took the sentiment out of context I apologize!

Thanks to both of you for adding to--and updating!--the record!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Rick and Alan! Nice to hear from both of you!</p>
<p>@Rick, I like your formulation (an ounce of cure&#8230;). Pithy as always.</p>
<p>@Alan, I agree that the formulation in the pdf you link to is really interesting. Thanks for posting it. We&#8217;ll never know precisely what was said at that particular meeting, of course&#8211;now more than a decade ago. But I think it was part of a discussion that was making a slightly different point than your PDF. Regardless, if I took the sentiment out of context I apologize!</p>
<p>Thanks to both of you for adding to&#8211;and updating!&#8211;the record!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Kay</title>
		<link>http://epistemicgames.org/eg/the-lessons-of-a-pim-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-4886</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://epistemicgames.org/eg/the-lessons-of-a-pim-fail/#comment-4886</guid>
		<description>Hi Rick,

That&#039;s because I never said that &quot;quote&quot;. It got changed to a mis-quote which doesn&#039;t make a lot of sense. The actual version of this that I use is found in this little essay:
http://www.vpri.org/pdf/m2003001_human_cond.pdf

Cheers,

Alan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rick,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s because I never said that &#8220;quote&#8221;. It got changed to a mis-quote which doesn&#8217;t make a lot of sense. The actual version of this that I use is found in this little essay:<br />
<a href="http://www.vpri.org/pdf/m2003001_human_cond.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.vpri.org/pdf/m2003001_human_cond.pdf</a></p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Alan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Borovoy</title>
		<link>http://epistemicgames.org/eg/the-lessons-of-a-pim-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-4877</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Borovoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://epistemicgames.org/eg/the-lessons-of-a-pim-fail/#comment-4877</guid>
		<description>Excellent point.    It reminds me of our saying that, contrary to conventional wisdom, &quot;an ounce of cure is often worth a pound of prevention&quot;  In other words, if you&#039;re at risk of a bunch of low probability bad  things happening, it may be more efficient to wait to see what does happen, rather than bearing the cost of proactively addressing a broad range of potential threats.  Of course, it all depends on the risks and the costs, which is the point you&#039;re making.

By the way, I have no recollection of saying that quote, but do have many fond memories of &quot;back benching&quot; at Alan Kay meetings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point.    It reminds me of our saying that, contrary to conventional wisdom, &#8220;an ounce of cure is often worth a pound of prevention&#8221;  In other words, if you&#8217;re at risk of a bunch of low probability bad  things happening, it may be more efficient to wait to see what does happen, rather than bearing the cost of proactively addressing a broad range of potential threats.  Of course, it all depends on the risks and the costs, which is the point you&#8217;re making.</p>
<p>By the way, I have no recollection of saying that quote, but do have many fond memories of &#8220;back benching&#8221; at Alan Kay meetings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

